Search this site

 

««Nov 2009»»
SMTWTFS
1234567
891011121314
15
16
171819
20
21
22232425262728
2930

Message Pad

~ Martin ~
It still allow in the UK to wear anything - no illegal, maybe depend on country, I was wear tights and denim mini skirt that seem to be allow in public Ive wearing many time as cops passing me without stop or ask anything
~ Doug ~
In the US it's illegal to be dressed indecently, but not illegal to crossdress. Also, where would you draw the line? Some people might claim that all the boys wearing girls skinny jeans are crossdressing.
~ Rod ~
is it legal to crossdress when outside as a female
~ Andy M ~
epilators have been suggested. I've just bought a Braun and done my first epilate session. So far so good, but still a long way from hair free legs (which are essential for any tights wearing!!!)
~ Adrian ~
With winter on the way I shall be cutting down on heating bills by wearing opaque tights with a wool kilt.
~ 2craze2 ~
@badleg: Try Elbeo Sheer Magic or Elbeo Caresse. Size XL is available. They really do help...
~ 2craze2 ~
Ordered some tights from Emilio Cavallini, they're great! Good stretch, warm, opaque. Good replacement for my regular sock-wearing.
~ kingrichards ~
hi guys,new UK bodybuilder here, looks like a decent forum with lots of good info - hopefully i can contribute & learn.
~ Lucky ~
Men should wear tights for any reason also protect from blood flow that quite important, I do wear all time, love it. I wear with skirt that nornmal clothes
~ hoseclad ~
Hi to all, glad to see im not the only one out there,though i was all alone for for a long time. best reguards.

Latest Entries

Corey's story

Friday, 20 November 2009
In which Corey tells why he wears tights / pantyhose regularly for leg pains

Men wearing tights - the objections - III

Monday, 16 November 2009
The last part of Geraden's enquiry into the objections to (men) wearing tights.

More on leg pains

Wednesday, 21 October 2009
In which Geraden tells about his leg pain problems and how tights helped.

Changing Reasons III

Friday, 16 October 2009
In which TightsVirus concludes his personal story.

Changing Reasons II

Thursday, 24 September 2009
In which TightsVirus continues his personal story. Second of a series.

Changing Reasons I

Friday, 11 September 2009
In which TightsVirus sets the scene for his personal story. First of a series.

Men wearing tights - the objections - IV

Wednesday, 12 August 2009
In which Geraden responds to an enquiry and picks up an old thread.

Stealth or ... ?

Wednesday, 22 July 2009
In which Geraden contrasts the results of a poll on this blog with advice from a sympathetic female writer

Leo's Story

Wednesday, 15 July 2009
In which Leo tells how he wore tights first out of curiosity, then for the fell, and finally for medical reasons

Tights and Asperger's

Sunday, 24 May 2009
In which Geraden raises the possibility of a connection between men wearing tights and autism / Asperger's Syndrome

Top links

Mailing List

Please sign up to get information on new entries.
Be sure that the 'Remain Anonymous' box is not ticked because anonymous subscribers are not accepted.

Second and third attempts at waxing

posted Monday, 16 October 2006
Geradenby Geraden

 

Readers may remember that I bought some 'Wax Away' waxing strips at Sainsbury's recently. I used them up slowly, maybe one or two pairs of strips per day until they were all gone. I had a reasonable degree of success on my lower legs, less so on my thighs and very poor removal of hair from my knees. The backs of my knees and thighs were still very hairy.

I then tried a packet of Boots Single Use strips. I reasoned that I was not getting more than about one effective use from my old strips anyway. This was not a good choice.

Unfortunately the name of Boots did not guarantee either quality or success. Instead of having a gel coating, these strips were like wide pieces of sellotape on a shiny backing paper. And not much more effective! Using these strips I removed about 50% of the remaining leg hair, but I could see I would either have to go back to shaving, or find something more effective.

VeetSo I thought I would go for a well-known brand name as a final try. I bought 40 Veet strips (£9.99 from Sainsbury's). These are gel strips, and like the Wax Away the came in pairs back to back. The application of the gel on the strips seemed much less even than with the Wax Away ones. However after separation the gel seemed to flow evenly on the second strip that I set aside while I used the first one. I found these much more effective than either of the others, and the strips are indeed good for five or six applications. However they do seem to cause more pinkish patches and red spots than the other brands, but they are only temporary.

I would say that these are the most effective waxing strips of the three I have tried, and so (on cost grounds) they should be!

I am not sure I am getting the same smoothness with waxing as with newly shaved legs, but on the other hand I am not getting the same roughness that you get with not so newly shaved legs!

I will stick with the waxing (bad pun there, methinks) until the wax strips are used up, then I will see whether the long term result is better, or worse, than with shaving.
If you would like to comment on this entry, please click on the 'Comments' link below.

links: technorati    




1. Jamod left...
Tuesday, 17 October 2006 7:51 am

I think such waxing strips are un-economical: for the price of three packs of Veet you can buy a Philips Bodygroom (men's) shaver - and there are many more 'ladyshavers' on the market to choose from (I use a Remington) for similar money. I've tried the cream version of Veet - it doesn't smell very pleasant, and it doesn't give anywhere as near as good results as shaving. For those that are interested, the Philips Bodygroom can be found at Boots the Chemist, and here - http://www.shavers.co.uk/shopping.php? node_id=38&manufacturer_id=3&class_id=2


2. Geraden left...
Tuesday, 17 October 2006 11:49 am

Hi Jamod

I have tried foil shavers - they do not shave as close as a wet shave razor: in fact they cannot do so. I will not use depil creams. If they are strong enough to dissolve the thicker hair that men have (which rules out all the ones I have tried) you are left wondering what damage they are doing to your skin. There have been reports of quite nasty chemical burns from depil creams. And as you say, the smell is bad too.

I have now removed about 90% of my leg hair using the Veet strips, and I am beginning to think that waxing may have some advantages over shaving after all. Certainly you do not have to do it all again after two days!

I have activated the link that you put in your comment, btw. (Links should be enclosed in square brackets to be clickable.)

Geraden


3. Jamod left...
Tuesday, 17 October 2006 12:50 pm

I completely agree with you that ladysavers that only employ a foil method alone do not remove leg hair effectively. That's why I chose the Remington 'Smooth & Silky' model (also available on the Shavers website for £23) that has a 'floating trimmer' that lifts and cuts hair prior to the foil following behind for a closer finish. The added bonus is that it can be used for wet and dry leg shaving. I'd buy an identical model if I was currently in the market.


4. Geraden left...
Tuesday, 17 October 2006 3:13 pm :: http://geraden.blog-city.com/

Jamod

My daughter has a wet/dry shaver with a trimmer - it must be similar or even identical to the one you describe. I have used it several times, and yes, the trimmer part is probably more useful than the foil shaver.

But there is still a fixed blade between the moving blade and the skin, so there is no way the shave can be as close as with a wet razor, particularly a multi-blade one.

Having said that, I think some of the multi blade ones are ridiculous. Gillette's latest 5 blade offering, for example, getting one up on Wilkinson Sword, who apparently only developed a four bladed razor becasue Gillette had patented their three blade one in response to Wilkie's dual blade one!

Geraden


Tag Related Posts