Search this site

 

««Nov 2008»»
SMTWTFS
      
1
2
3
45678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30

Message Pad

~ denier ~
Tescos and boots are now selling veet wax strips for men. surely that means that thing have shifted towards legwear for me? now is the time to buy tights for men and make a shift in the market. particularly in these uncertain times for retailers.
~ happy79 ~
i love tights i love the littlewoods selection
~ tight man ~
i love tights i am a gay man and me and my husband alwys shop for tights i wish i wasnot lauged at for wearing tights
~ dougaa ~
To iwanttights: that's a difficult question. Some parents are accepting and some are not. Maybe try wearing tights for sports or a costume (where you have an excuse) and see how they react.
~ Lucky09 ~
there is plenty of tights for men to buy online - it still getting more for men on the market - im still wearing tights all time
~ iwanttights ~
I want to wear tights but don't know how my parents will take it. What should I do?
~ spsrs3 ~
I have several pairs of the Ames-Walker "Leotards" that are specifically made for men. I am 6'4" 225# and they fit well.Texture is a little rough though
~ kirkbryan1961@comcast.net ~
Are any of the made-for-men hose a true medical compression, like 20-30mmHg? With varicose veins I am supposed to wear them but what I have tried from med manuf. are very expensive and too short.
~ Geraden ~
proslaviy - my email address is geraden@gmail.com
~ proslaviy ~
Hi, how I can send PM?

Latest Entries

Fall is in the air

Monday, 3 November 2008
In which Wolford's returns to wearing tights ... and admiring the ladies who wear them!

Thoughts

Saturday, 1 November 2008
In which a reader called Andy gives his thoughts on the subject of men wearing tights

Clear Sheers

Thursday, 18 September 2008
in which a guest writer tells how he envied members of the female sex for their sheer nylon tights, and came to wear them himself

Shelley does it again

Thursday, 28 August 2008
in which Geraden compares two articles on male hosiery written in the same month by the same writer.

Media interest

Thursday, 7 August 2008
in which Geraden remarks on recent media interest in men's legwear.

Andy's story

Thursday, 10 July 2008
Andy's personal story

Another personal story

Tuesday, 10 June 2008
Another personal story of a man's discovery of tights.

Emmeline Rules

Wednesday, 28 May 2008
In which a lady guest relates how her partner told her about his tights wearing, and how she supported him to the hilt.

Keeping Straight

Tuesday, 20 May 2008
In which Geraden gives a tip for not getting tights in a twist.

Spilling the Beans

Saturday, 17 May 2008
in which Dave gives his mother-in- law a surprise

Top links

Mailing List

Please sign up to get information on new entries.
Be sure that the 'Remain Anonymous' box is not ticked because anonymous subscribers are not accepted.

Men wearing tights - the objections - II

posted Monday, 24 July 2006
Geradenby Geraden

This is the second article in my series dealing with the objections to men wearing tights. In this instalment I summarise the responses that have been made so far to my original article, and I go on to speak personally about my early experiences.

I published the original article in September 2005, thinking it would generate some interest. At the time, interest was slow to take off. No comments were made until (in desperation) I myself made one in November, remarking upon the underwhelming response. However, since January there has been a steady stream of comments, making this article the now the most commented entry on the site. With over 2,300 hits to date, I predict that it will soon also become the most read article on the site.

It is uncommon for a man to be seen in tights / pantyhose, therefore such behaviour is considered odd. People do not approve. A lot of this disapproval is societal - people are uncomfortable with behaviour that deviates from what they consider to be normal. Added to this, are religious and moral objections, which we are trying to cover here. The two kinds of disapproval, moral and societal, are probably related to each other as cause and effect (though we could debate endlessly which is the cause and which the effect!)

One visitor, Steve, was left cold by all of this. He said, "Just wear, life's s**t as it is. Enjoy yourself have fun". I think he will speak for many, even those who do not follow his choice of words. On the other hand the popularity of this topic shows that there is a lot of interest in the moral and religious aspects of the subject. The big question is whether these objections can be answered on their own terms, rather than in the way Steve did!

To pick up from other comments left on this blog, Stuart/Sarah said, "I spent many years struggling with guilt about my love of wearing tights." Jim said, "As a Christian, I do have serious guilt issues, but not because of the Deuteronomy text. My feelings are derived from the fact that I do not wish to be shunned nor exiled from my church family which is important to my wife and me" (Though I would guess that the possibility of shunning has more than a little to do th the Deut. text.)

And what about Geraden, you ask? I had tremendous guilt feelings about wearing, right from the start. For me there were two factors: one was the fear about what people would think and say if they knew that I liked to wear tights. I am talking mainly about people whom I respected, my family, teachers, clergy, as well as my peers. In my own mind I was the only man in the world whose desires were so perverted that he would want to wear tights!

The other factor was guilt. I was an adolescent and like many adolescents I was unprepared for the physical changes that were taking place. The new hormones that were sloshing about in my body opened up unexpected possibilities for experimentation, pleasure and remorse alike.

Suddenly I thought I knew what girls were for! These lovely creatures, in whom I had shown no interest hitherto, were suddenly desirable and at the same time unavailable. Some were more attractive than others, but this was the 1960s: - one thing that they all had in common was tights!

All sorts of things happened. I fell hopelessly in love; I have always been an old romantic, however here I will say no more here about my romantic attachments! This is where I talk about tights, and tights were the wonderful garments that both concealed and revealed the delectable female form. The girl I was in love with had no interest in me, but tights became for me a symbol of unattainable femininity.

Just let us say that I started to wear tights myself, and that putting on a pair of tights was invariably accompanied by certain physical effects, unexpected at first, but leading to some very pleasant sensations. I knew that the desire for these sensations was wrong, but I was young and weak and my hormones were strong.

I did not really 'wear' tights in those days. I used to put them on; then what happened, happened, then I took them off. By that time I was feeling shame and revulsion, and making rash promises to myself never to put a pair of tights on ever again. Oh, I could resist temptation for a time, but sooner or later I used to succumb. And I knew that I would.

In my view tights were wonderful garments and I was thoroughly ashamed that I was using them for unworthy purposes.

If I had thought more deeply about it, I might have said something like: men do not wear tights (except in a few very restricted circumstances, for example in the arts and entertainment world). That does not necessarily make it wrong to do so, though it does no doubt create a stigma that one would naturally wish to avoid. I might have gone on to say that even if the wearing itself was morally neutral (as it probably was) the reasons I was wearing were unworthy (as in lustful, selfish) and that meant that the wearing itself was a thing to be avoided.

My own religious position at the time was on the high-church wing of the Church of England. I did not call my self an Anglo-Catholic, though I did believe that, as an Anglican, I was in fact a true heir to the catholic church. Certainly I was not an evangelical. Although I was aware of Deut 22:5 you may quite rightly assume that it did not figure highly in my reasoning.

Be that as it may, I must now turn to examine Deut 22:5; but for that you will have to wait.

FirstPrevious1 |  2

If you would like to comment on this entry, please click on the 'Comments' link below.

tags:      

links: technorati    




1. Wolfords left...
Monday, 24 July 2006 4:02 pm

Geraden, I feel just wear what makes you happy, and be happy. To heck what others think.....

  • Wolford's


2. Geraden left...
Monday, 24 July 2006 4:20 pm

Hi Wolfords,

Your view echoes that of Steve (referred to above), though yours is expressed with rather more decorum!

To all those who think like that – I must say that is not a problem for me, but this post is not really addressed to you. Judging by the number of hits this topic has already received, there is a lot of interest in the subject: clearly the religious and moral aspects of hosiery wearing are live issues for some men.

If however this leaves you cold, please bear with me while I try to help and support the others who would like to see the issues discussed.

And by all means comment on the actual issues!

Geraden


3. Granville West left...
Tuesday, 25 July 2006 9:20 pm

This, to me, is a very significant discussion. Your fellow churchgoers would call me a Methodist heretic ;-), but we do take the Scripture seriously. The most interesting insight I have on this came from a "hard-shell" Baptist preacher who observed that if Deut. 22:5 is applicable to our lives today, so must 22:11 ("Do not wear clothes of wool and linen together."). He recalled a sermon he heard once about 22:5 where the preacher was wearing a wool suit and a linen shirt.

No one can keep the Mosaic law, that is why you and I are Christians, because of the grace of Jesus. Our only restriction is not to wear (or eat) anything in a situation where it weakens another's faith (I Corinthians 8:9).

I personally would not dress like a woman, but when interpreted through the New Testament, I do not see a flat prohibition against doing so.


4. Geraden left...
Wednesday, 26 July 2006 6:29 am

Hi Granville

Well said, you Methodist heretic! I agree with your approach. A strong case can be made out for considering the prohibition in Dt 22:5 (along with that in Dt 22:11 etc) as part of the Judaic ceremonial law, which is not binding on Christians. By the way, Dt 22:11 does not seem to me to prohibit wearing a wool suit and a linen shirt. It is the mixed fabrics in one garment that are prohibited, so far as I can see. Of course, tights (/pantyhose) made from a nylon / lycra mixture are definitely out!

I will have more to say about this later.

Geraden


5. Jesse left...
Sunday, 27 August 2006 12:23 pm

If you are a Christian it is because Jesus came to pay the penalty for our sins. No one can follow the letter of the law as laid down in Deuteronomy. This is why we need Christ. He paid the penalty, He is the Law.


6. littledog28 left...
Monday, 6 August 2007 6:02 pm

My love for pantyhose for me and for woman is deep rooted. I love them. So much like loving to sin. I say that because when I wear or put effort toward pantyhose it causes me to have lustful thoughts (sinful) and spend time doing things that I otherwise wouldn't take the time to do (sinful things). I am coming to the conclusion that if these things cause me to sin, I should "pluck" it out as if it were an eye. At the same time I get so much from them and beautiful woman wearing them. Basically I am not honoring God when I put time into them. It is so hard to leave them behind since they are such a part of who I am. Some men can wear without sinning. I can if I wear often enough. They become like sox. But when I am denied wearing them they take on a more intense obsession. Still working through this.


7. supporthose left...
Saturday, 24 November 2007 5:36 am

Det 22.5 speaks about crossdressing in order to fool another gender in order to gain access to a place (in certain situations) that usually are not allowed. You have to know what this scripture is referring to. If wearing pantyhose is something that God is convicting you of, I would say to pray about it and ask God if He wants you to stop. The Bible also says not to do anything that causes confusion also. They are many ways to look at this, but I believe the most important issue is salvation. The Bible says, "It shall come to pass, that whosoever will call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved" . Seek ye first the kingdom of God, and all His righteousness, and all these things shall be added unto you - Matthew 6,33


8. searcher left...
Monday, 26 November 2007 5:31 am

Personally I've never dealt with feelings of guilt on the religious matters of men wearing pantyhose, but I do feel pitty for those who do.

I was raised with the message that Jezes loves us, and everybody who believes so goes to heaven (in the meantime, I switched to the idea of an earthly paradise, but that's just a minor detail).

I think the main idea of the new testament is to love eachother, ourselves (!) and above all love God, and don't harm anyone.

I think being a man wearing pantysose (thigh-highs in my case) on itsself does not harm anyone.

searcher


9. wot left...
Sunday, 2 December 2007 5:10 pm

I wear tights because of vericose veins, and therefore have a medical reason that legitmises me wearing them. Because of this my wife was totally cool about me wearing them. I have to say though even if I did not have the medical problem, I fail to see what all the fuss is about. People who object to men wearing tights or anything for that matter really should get a life. I'm a practising Christian, but believe in a common sense Christianity which doesn't get hung up on individual lines of scripture, but rather tries to follow the spirit of what Jesus was saying. I find in life generally that if you take this line, you have very few problems in getting along with people. One of the things that I abhore the most is the fundamentalist/ turn or burn brigade. For me, tights/stockings are not a fetish, they're nothing to do with cross-dressing. They are immensely practical legwear, and the sooner people grow up and get a life the better frankly.


10. Andre left...
Friday, 4 January 2008 1:49 pm

I'v worn tights for many years and I wouldn't go out without them. They are so comfortable and feel great against your skin. I wear them all the time whether it be under pants or worn with a pair of shorts. I know people have seen them and apart from the occasional idiot remark, no one has ever batted an eye-lid. It's me who gets the thrill from wearing them.